IELTS Academic Writing Task 1: Regular Physical Activity in Australia
The Task:
The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
Percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity: 2010
Task 1
Advertisement
Band 9 Model Answer
The provided bar chart compares the proportion of Australian men and women across six distinct age demographics who engaged in regular physical activity during the year 2010.
Overall, it is highly apparent that women generally exhibited higher rates of regular physical activity than men across almost all age categories. The only exception was the youngest demographic, where male participation significantly outpaced that of females. Furthermore, while women’s activity levels peaked during middle age, men’s participation experienced a notable dip before recovering in their senior years.
Looking closely at the youngest and oldest cohorts, men aged 15 to 24 were the most active male demographic, with participation standing at nearly 53%. This was significantly higher than their female counterparts in the same age bracket, who recorded roughly 48%. Interestingly, by the time both genders reached the oldest age group (65 and over), their activity levels converged, with both men and women reporting an identical participation rate of approximately 47%.
Turning to the middle demographics (ages 25 to 64), a distinct gender gap emerged in favor of women. While male participation dropped sharply to roughly 42% in the 25-34 age group and hit a low of nearly 40% between the ages of 35 and 44, female participation steadily increased. Women’s physical activity levels hovered around 49% to 53% throughout these middle decades, peaking at roughly 53% in the 45-54 and 55-64 age brackets. During these same decades, male participation gradually recovered to 45%, but still remained noticeably lower than female participation.
💡 Why this is a Band 9 Answer:
- Task Achievement: The answer flawlessly summarizes the chart, completely replacing the repetitive, ungrammatical phrasing of the original draft. The overview highlights the overarching trends: women generally being more active, the exception in the youngest group, and the dip in middle-aged men.
- Coherence & Cohesion: Paragraphs are logically organized. One paragraph focuses on the outliers (the youngest and oldest groups where men led or tied), while the next focuses on the middle years (where women dominated). Transition phrases guide the reader smoothly (Overall, Looking closely at, Interestingly, Turning to).
- Lexical Resource: Uses precise, advanced vocabulary appropriate for describing demographic data (proportion, distinct age demographics, significantly outpaced, converged, identical participation rate, distinct gender gap).
- Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Employs a superb mix of complex sentence structures flawlessly while maintaining highly accurate comparative phrasing (“While male participation dropped sharply… female participation steadily increased.”).
Advertisement
IELTS Academic Writing Task 2: Sharing Information
The Task:
Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Write at least 250 words.
Task 2
Band 9 Model Essay
In the modern knowledge economy, the management of information is a highly contentious issue. While a strong global movement advocates for the unrestricted, open-source sharing of academic, scientific, and business data to accelerate human progress, others argue that certain intellectual property must be fiercely protected. In my opinion, although the open exchange of fundamental academic and scientific knowledge is crucial for societal advancement, restricting highly valuable business and sensitive scientific information is an absolute necessity to maintain economic incentives and ensure public safety.
Those who champion the unrestricted sharing of information emphasize the profound benefits of global collaboration. In the academic and scientific realms, siloing data heavily retards human progress. When researchers across the globe openly share their findings, peer-reviewed data, and technological breakthroughs, it prevents the duplication of effort and exponentially accelerates innovation. A prime example of this was the unprecedented global sharing of genomic data during the recent global health crises, which allowed international teams of scientists to develop life-saving vaccines in record time. From this perspective, hoarding knowledge for exclusive institutional gain is morally indefensible when human lives or global ecological health are at stake.
Conversely, proponents of information restriction base their arguments on pragmatism, economic survival, and security. In the business world, research and development (R&D) require massive financial investments. If pharmaceutical companies or technology firms were forced to freely share their proprietary algorithms or drug formulas, the financial incentive to innovate would completely evaporate, leading to a stagnant global economy. Furthermore, protecting intellectual property through patents ensures that creators are fairly compensated for their risk and labor.
Beyond economics, there is a severe security imperative for restricting certain scientific data. Freely publishing the intricate details of nuclear physics, advanced artificial intelligence, or the genetic engineering of highly infectious pathogens would be catastrophically dangerous, potentially equipping malicious actors with the tools to cause global devastation.
In conclusion, while the democratization of general academic and scientific knowledge undeniably fosters rapid global development, total transparency is dangerously idealistic. The protection of proprietary business data is fundamentally required to drive economic innovation, and the restriction of sensitive scientific research is essential for global security. Therefore, a balanced approach—open collaboration in foundational research, coupled with strict safeguards for high-value intellectual property—is the most logical path forward.
💡 Why this is a Band 9 Answer:
- Task Response: The essay perfectly addresses both views in the prompt. It thoroughly explains why open sharing is good (accelerates progress, global collaboration, health crises) and vigorously defends why restriction is necessary (R&D financial incentives, preventing malicious actors from obtaining dangerous scientific data).
- Coherence & Cohesion: The essay utilizes a highly effective four-paragraph structure. Transition phrases guide the reader effortlessly through the complex arguments (Those who champion, A prime example of this, Conversely, Furthermore, Beyond economics, In conclusion).
- Lexical Resource: Showcases an exceptional, sophisticated vocabulary suited for an economic and scientific discursive essay (knowledge economy, contentious issue, siloing data, morally indefensible, pragmatism, proprietary algorithms, democratization).
- Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Uses a wide variety of complex grammatical structures perfectly, creating a highly persuasive, authoritative, and academic tone.
Advertisement